Can I Be Your Legacy? Love, Illusion, and the Slow Burn We Often Overlook
- Jerusalem Brown, LPC, NCC
- Mar 10
- 5 min read
Updated: Mar 13

The question "Can I be Your Legacy?" uttered by Slim near the end of the film Queen & Slim hit me like a brick to the chest. Because isn’t that what we all want, in some way? A love that doesn’t just feel good in the moment but leaves an imprint—something real, something lasting. Not just a whirlwind of passion that burns hot and fast but a connection built on knowing, truly knowing (and, dare I say, understanding), another person.
And yet, most of us—myself included—have been bamboozled by the illusion of love before. We mistake intensity for intimacy, passion for permanence, and chemistry for connection. We chase the high of fast love, the kind that sweeps us off our feet, only to realize later that we never actually had solid ground to stand on in the first place.
So what’s the difference? What separates the kind of love that stands the test of time from the kind that feels like love but is really just love-bombing, fantasy, or trauma-bonding in disguise?
And more importantly, where do our beliefs about love even come from???
Fast Love vs. Slow Burn: What Queen & Slim Taught Me About Connection
Let’s break down two distinct types of love: the rush of fast love vs. the slow burn.
Fast love hits hard and fades fast, while slow-burning love builds with intention and depth. Sure, there may be something in between—those "almosts," those “right person, wrong time” situations—but at the core, most love stories lean toward instant intensity or a steady, lasting connection.
Which one have you been chasing?
There’s the kind that moves fast, skips the hard conversations, and thrives on instant chemistry, grand gestures, and emotional intensity. The kind where you don’t really know someone—you just know how they make you feel in the moment.
Then there’s the slow burn—the love that takes its time, that builds through observation, conversation, and consistency. The love that isn’t just about what someone says, but what they show you over time.
Queen & Slim gives us a rare look at how real connection isn’t always instant—it’s forged through experience, trust, and seeing each other beyond the masks we usually wear. Queen and Slim didn’t start as hot, heavy, and fast lovers. Truth be told, it seems like they weren’t even feeling each other at first. But through proximity, shared experience, and vulnerability, they stripped away their facades and met each other as they truly were.
Let’s break it down.
Fast Love vs. Slow-Burning Love: A Reality Check
For my visual learners, here’s a structured breakdown of how love-bombing, fast passion, and slow-burning intimacy differ.
Fast Love (Illusion of Connection) | Slow Burn (True Connection) |
Sparks fly immediately—no real foundation. | Attraction builds over time through real compatibility. |
Moves quickly—intense confessions, 'I love you' too soon. | Grows through consistency, not just words. |
Prioritizes passion over emotional depth. | Emotional intimacy deepens before full physical intimacy. |
Can feel like fate, but often fueled by trauma or fantasy. | Feels natural and grounded—no rush, no pressure. |
Little to no observation—red flags get ignored. | Observing patterns and behaviors to see if they align. |
Love-bombing followed by emotional withdrawal. | Security, reliability, and steady emotional investment. |
Creates a high, then a crash when reality sets in. | Feels like a stable flame—not fireworks that fade fast. |
Chemistry mistaken for compatibility. | Compatibility over time deepens chemistry. |
Driven by idealization—seeing what we want to see. | Seeing and loving someone for who they actually are. |
How Our Notions of Love Are Shaped (and Sometimes Warped)
For most of us, the way we approach love isn’t random—it’s learned.
We internalize messages from:
Our parents' relationships: Did we see love that was patient, or love that was performative?
Our own past relationships: Were we taught to wait and see, or did we rush because we feared love would leave?
Music, film, and TV: Were we raised on stories where love meant grand gestures and chaos, or where love was about showing up, day after day?
Our self-worth: Do we chase fast love because we don’t believe someone will stick around long enough to love us slowly?
For a long time, I didn’t realize my attraction to emotionally unavailable men wasn’t a coincidence—it was a pattern. Fast love had me caught up in what felt like a connection, but it was really just the thrill of trying to earn affection from people who weren’t capable of giving it because that was what I knew.
And then one day, I realized—eww.
Like, actually, eww. The moment I started valuing slowness, stability, and real emotional availability, the people I used to chase (or pine for) suddenly seemed...unappealing, like expired milk.
What Queen & Slim Got Right About Love Born in Survival
This brings me back to Queen & Slim.
Their love wasn’t built on a grand, sweeping romance—it was a byproduct of survival, forced proximity, and the shedding of social masks. They were forced to be real with each other because there was no space for pretending.
Take the Jook Joint scene—one of the film's most beautiful, raw moments.
By that point, Queen and Slim had already been through hell together, but they got to simply be, in that moment. They slow-danced, laughed, enjoyed spending time together, felt safe with each other, and saw each other. They weren’t running. They weren’t strategizing. They were connecting.
And that’s when love starts to feel real—not in the intensity of the chase but in the quiet moments where we pay attention to each other, get to know each other, and feel seen by each other.
Later, when Queen tells Slim, "Thank you for this journey, no matter how it ends," that’s when you know—their love isn’t just about what they’re feeling anymore. It’s about seeing, knowing, and choosing each other.
Crowning Thoughts: Learning to Choose the Love That Chooses You
So here’s the real question—are we mistaking love that excites us for love that actually nourishes us?
Have we been conditioned to fall for the familiar, even when it’s unhealthy?
For me, the answer was yes—until I realized I had the power to rewrite my love story.
And I’m inviting you to do the same.
Ask yourself:
Have I been chasing excitement over consistency?
Do I pay attention to how people love me, not just how much they say they love me?
Where did my beliefs about love come from, and do they actually serve me?
I’ll be unpacking more about my own past patterns of attraction to emotionally unavailable men in my next Thinking Out Loud post. If you’ve ever felt like you knew someone wasn’t good for you but still felt drawn to them, you don’t want to miss it.
In the meantime, what’s your definition of love? Has it been leading you toward the legacy of love you actually deserve? Let’s talk. Drop your thoughts in the comments!
Комментарии